Krishan Kumar& Ors. vs. The State Of Haryana State Of Haryana And Ors. Through The Chief Secretary Tothe Govt. Of Haryana

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.5 SECTION IV-B SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).28019-28021/2014 GULSHAN KUMAR & ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (only Office Report on Default in SLP (C) Nos. 28019-21 of 2014 is to be listed) Date: 24-02-2020 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBER] Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, AOR For Petitioner(s) Ms. Hardeep Kaur Mishra, Adv. Mr. Gautam Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Adv. Mr. Suresh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Atul Wadera, Adv. Mr. Medhavi Kumar, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Singh, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

As per Office Report dated 20.02.2020, learned counsel for the petitioners ought to have taken fresh steps in respect of unserved respondents no.10 & 11. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a letter dated 27.11.2019 for dasti service in respect of unserved respondents no.10 & 11.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted respondents that respondents no.10 & 11 are proforma $and.$ therefore, service upon respondents no.10 & 11 may be dispensed with.

_{pnature Not Verified} Considering the request of learned counsel appearing for the Distriction of the second state of the problem in the second state of the second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second s "broforma respondents is dispensed with.

(MAHABIR SINGH) $AR$ -cum-PS

(BEENA JOLLY) BRANCH OFFICER