Rajini Brian Castellino vs. Union Of India

6' REVISED ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 264 OF 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) M/S ALCAST FOUNDRY PVT. LTD. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report )) WITH W.P(C) NO. 265 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report ) W.P(C) NO. 266 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report ) W.P(C) NO. 270 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report ) W.P(C) NO. 271 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report ) W.P(C) NO. 280 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report )

Date: 10/05/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR Mrs. Rashmi Singhania, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. R.3 in WP 264/13 Mr. Keshav Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue Rule, returnable eight weeks hence. Let the matters be heard along with C.A.No.5680 of 2009. In the meantime, the proceedings taken by the Bank under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (the SARFAESI Act), shall remain stayed.

Since the respondent No.3 is represented by Ms. Abha R.Sharma, in Writ Petition No. 264 of 2013, service of notice on the said respondent is dispensed with.

Let the other respondents in all the writ petitions be served, both in the usual course and also by way of dasti service.

|(Sheetal Dhingra) | |(Juginder Kaur) | |AR-cum-PS | |Assistant Registrar | ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 264 OF 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) M/S ALCAST FOUNDRY PVT. LTD. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report )) WITH W.P(C) NO. 265 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report ) W.P(C) NO. 266 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report ) W.P(C) NO. 270 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report ) W.P(C) NO. 271 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report ) W.P(C) NO. 280 of 2013 (FOR PREL. HEARING) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report ) Date: 10/05/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR Mrs. Rashmi Singhania, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. R.3 in WP 264/13 Mr. Keshav Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue Rule, returnable eight weeks hence. Let the matters be heard along with C.A.No.5680 of 2009. In the meantime, the demand and recovery of Transit Fees on forest produce, shall remain stayed. Since the respondent No.3 is represented by Ms. Abha R.Sharma, in Writ Petition No. 264 of 2013, service of notice on the said respondent is dispensed with. Let the other respondents in all the writ petitions be served, both in the usual course and also by way of dasti service. |(Sheetal Dhingra) | |(Juginder Kaur) |

|AR-cum-PS | |Assistant Registrar |