Tumpa Haldar vs. The Managing Committee, Contain Rahamania High Madrasha

ITEM NO.301

COURT NO.6

SECTION XVI

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 5808/2017

SK. MD. RAFIQUE

Appellant(s)

VERSUS

MANAGING COMMITTEE, CONTAI RAHAMANIA HIGH MADRASAH AND ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

(IA 60345/2018, 130846/2018, 145689/2018, 147805/2018)

WITH

C.A. No. 6098/2017 (XVI)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 670/2017 In SLP(C) No. 6661/2016 (XVI)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 669/2017 In SLP(C) No. 6661/2016 (XVI) $(IA)$ No.115718/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS $\quad\text{and}\quad$ No.116359/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 828/2017 In SLP(C) No. 6661/2016 (XVI)

C.A. No. 5809/2017 (XVI)

C.A. No. 5826/2017 (XVI)

C.A. No. 5817/2017 (XVI)

C.A. No. 5814/2017 (XVI) (and IA No.69747/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.100911/2017-impleading party) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 583/2016 In SLP(C) No. 6661/2016 (XVI)

C.A. No. 5829/2017 (XVI)

$\begin{array}{c}\n\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.5,baseline=(current bounding box.center)]\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$};\n \node at (0,0) {$\cdot$$ (with IA 2/2016)

Signature Not Verified

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 846/2016 In SLP(C) No. 6661/2016 (XVI)

$TA$

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1509/2017 in C.A. No. 5808/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) W.P.(C) No. 742/2017 (X) (IA No.78575/2017-STAY APPLICATION) W.P.(C) No. 629/2017 (X) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1798/2017 in C.A. No. 5808/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 937/2018 in C.A. No. 5808/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 938/2018 in C.A. No. 5808/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) W.P.(C) No. 351/2018 (X) W.P.(C) No. 348/2018 (X) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1219/2018 in C.A. No. 5808/2017 (XVI) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1274/2018 in C.A. No. 5808/2017 (XVI) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1669/2018 in C.A. No. 5808/2017 (XVI) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1921-1922/2018 in C.A. No. 5808/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 13-12-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT Counsel for the parties Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Adv. Mrs. Adeeba Mujahid, Adv. Mr. Ashwin Kumar D.S., Adv. Ms. Aditi Dani, Adv. Mr. Ketan Paul, Adv. Mr. Shahan Ulla, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Adv. Ms. Sonal Mashankar, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Y. S. Narula, Sr. Adv.

2

Mr. Ali Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Azeem Kalebudde, Adv. Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atarup Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Abu Sohel, Adv. Ms. Azra Rahman, Adv. Mr. Arpit Shukla, Adv. Mr. Anindo Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Kalyan Bandopadhyay, Sr. Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Adv. Mrs. Sarla Chandra, Adv. Mr. Khairul Alam, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pijush K. Roy, Adv. Mrs. Kakali Roy, Adv. Mr. Rajan K. Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dave, Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, Adv. Mr. Aditya Samaddar, Adv. Ms. Sarah Haque, Adv. Mr. Subhashish Bhowmick, Adv. Ms. G. Goyal, Adv. Mr. Dipak Kumar Jena, Adv. Ms. Minakshi Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Jalabhar Das, Adv. Mr. Kumar Shourish, Adv. Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, Adv. Mr. Dibyadyuti Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Kumar Neeraj, Adv. Mr. B. P. Yadav, Adv. Mrs. Sarla Chandra, Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, AOR Mrs. Sarla Chandra, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, AOR Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, AOR Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR

Mrs. Sarla Chandra, AOR Mr. Zoheb Hossain, AOR

Ms. Anita Kanungo, AOR Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Dipak Kumar Jena, AOR Mr. Rajan K. Chourasia, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Writ Petition (C) No. 742 of 2017, Writ Petition (C) No. 351 of 2018 and Writ Petition (C) No. 348 of 2018 are detagged from this batch of matters. These writ petitions shall not be treated as Part Heard.

Rest of the matters

Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties.

Arguments concluded.

Judgment reserved.

Written submissions, if any, be filed within one week.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER