Maharashtra Coop. Sty. Wel. Asscn. . The Secretary vs. The State Of Maharashtra Department Of Co Operation And Textiles Mantralaya Its Secretary

$\overline{\text{MG}}$

For Respondent(s)

For Appellant(s)

ITEM NO.89

Mrs V. D. Khanna, Adv.

Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

The office report is that the appellants has filed the statement of case and the Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the same although he has been notified to do so by notice dated 21.4.2010 of the Registry. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 provides that where the respondent has entered appearance and he does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited Signa We Not Visit the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Geurt under the rules.

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

VERSUS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA

Civil Appeal No(s). 4100/2009

ROSE MARY COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. &ORS Appellant(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. <pre>(with interim relief and office report)</pre>

Date: 28/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

Respondent(s)