Olam Agro India Ltd(Previously Olam Exports India Ltd. ). Through Its Authorized Signatory Shr. Anupam Jain Asst. Manager S/O. Sh. R. C. Jain vs. The State Of Punjab Excise And Taxation Department Through Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Ordinary
Stage:
DEFAULT / OTHER MATTERS
Listed On:
16 May 2018
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.16
SECTION IV
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s). 5965/2010
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
Appellant(s)
Respondent $(s)$
VERSUS
NAV DURGA RICE MILLS. & ORS.
WITH C.A. No. 5963/2010 (IV) C.A. No. 5966/2010 (IV) C.A. No. 5969/2010 (IV) C.A. No. 5970/2010 (IV) C.A. No. 5971/2010 (IV) C.A. No. 5964/2010 (IV) C.A. No. 5321/2011 (IV)
Date: 27-09-2023 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL [IN CHAMBER]
For Appellant(s) Mr. M J Michael, Adv. Mr. Vijavan K., Adv. Mr. Ajit Pudussery, AOR
Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. S. S. Jauhar, AOR
Mr. Kshitij Mudgal, Adv. Ms. Anshul Rajora, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dubey, AOR
Mr. Ajit Pudussery, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Friffed No. 5963/2010
Counsel representing respondent no.8 prays for and is allowed four weeks time to bring on record documents to show that the name
of Respondent no.8 is actually "Sanjeev Rice Mills" and not "Sanjay Rice Mills" as has appeared in the cause title in the High Court as well before the Supreme Court.
C.A. No. 5964/2010
According to the office report, respondents no. 1 to 14 were served with notice, but no one has put in appearance on their behalf. Other respondents no. 15 and 16 are represented through their counsel.
In view of the above, the appeal is directed to proceed exparte against respondents no. 1 to 14.
(DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)