Sumit Raj vs. Ajeet Bagra

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:26 Apr 2018
CNR:SCIN010146852018

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble L. Nageswara Rao

Stage:

TOP OF THE LIST (FOR ADMISSION)

Remarks:

Dismissed

Listed On:

26 Apr 2018

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.7 SECTION XV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.D14685/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-04-2018 in SAW No.398/2018 passed by the High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jaipur)

SUMIT RAJ & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

AJEET BAGRA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.60616/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.60614/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP WITHOUT CERTIFIED/PLAIN COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER and IA No.60619/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS[TO BE TAKEN UP AT THE TOP OF BOARD AS FIRST ITEM ON 26.04.2018])

Date : 26-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

For Petitioner(s)Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Amrendra Sharan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ram Niwas Buri, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Singh, Adv.
Mr. Manu Srinath, Adv.
Mr. Srivignesh M.P., Adv.
Mr. Jose Abraham, AOR
Ms. Aprajitha Mukherjee, Adv.
For Respondent(s)Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Purvi Mathur, Adv.
Mr. Kushagra Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Sahir Husain, Adv.
Mr. Anuj Bhandari, AOR
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR
Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv.
Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv.

Mr. Ajit Kr. Sinha, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Permission to file the additional documents is granted to the petitioners.

Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon perusal of the record, we uphold the direction given by the High Court in paragraph (26) of the impugned common order dated 10.04.2018 passed in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.398 of 2018 and connected matters.

In the circumstances of this case, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed.

As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SH) ASST.REGISTRAR