Suresh Kumar vs. The State Of Haryana

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.7 SECTION IV-B SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) .................................... (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-02-2020 in RFA No.5773/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Harvana at Chandigarh) SANJAY KUMAR & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ (IA No.63994/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) WITH Diary No(s). 10657/2023 (IV-B) No.69634/2023-CONDONATION $\mathsf{OF}$ DELAY $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{N}$ $$ FILING and $TA$ No.69639/2023-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.69635/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.69642/2023-FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. CONDONATION $\mathsf{OF}$ DELAY IN and $TA$ No.69644/2023-DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT) Date: 16-05-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv. Mr. Abhava Nath Das, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Respondent $(s)$ UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. The application for permission to file the Special Leave Petition is allowed. application for deleting the name of proforma $\mathbf{2}$ The respondent No.4 is also allowed. $\mathbf{3}$ Delay condoned. $\mathbf{4}$ . The application for substitution is allowed. 5. Amended memo of parties be filed accordingly. ature Not Verified Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.19028-19029 of 2021.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) DEPUTY REGISTRAR

(PREETHI T.C.) COURT MASTER (NSH)