The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai vs. Triple Securities Pvt. Ltd
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
25 Apr 2025
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.15 +64+66 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.12860/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-03-2024 in WP No. 1803/2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay]
INCOME TAX OFFICER & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SALMA FAZAL MANEKIA Respondent(s)
FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 94747/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
WITH Diary No.17577/2025 (IX)
IA No. 97508/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
Diary No.16076/2025 (IX)
IA No. 98942/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
Diary No(s). 14667/2025 (IX)
IA No. 97556/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
With ITEM NO.64
Diary No(s). 14315/2025 FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 99437/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
WITH
Diary No(s). 16107/2025 (IX)
1
WITH ITEM NO.66
Diary No.17102/2025 FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 102093/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
WITH
Diary No.16099/2025 (IX)
IA No. 102283/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
Date : 25-04-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
For Petitioner(s) :Mr. N Venkataraman, A.S.G. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. Venkataraman Chandrashekhara Bharathi, Adv. Mrs. Anamika Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Navanjay Mahapatra, Adv. Mr. B K Satija, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. These Special Leave Petitions are covered by the Judgment of this Court rendered on 3-10-2024 in "Union of India & Ors. vs.
2
Rajeev Bansal" (Civil Appeal No.8629/2024 etc.) 2024 (11) Scale 473.
3. In view of the above, the petitions filed by the Revenue are disposed of. The assessee will be governed by reasons discussed in the said Judgment.
4. The assessing officers will dispose of the objections in terms of the law laid down by this Court. Thereafter, the assessee who is/are aggrieved will be at liberty to pursue all the rights and remedies in accordance with law, save and except for the issues which have been concluded in the Judgment.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(CHANDRESH) (POOJA SHARMA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)