Ajit Ghosh vs. Jayanta Ghosh

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:19 Jul 2021
CNR:SCIN010146632020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Mention Memo

Before:

Hon'ble A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

List On (Date) [27-07-2021]

Listed On:

19 Jul 2021

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

74565/2020,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.40 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVI

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 9394/2020

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-02-2020 in CO No. 4243/2019 passed by the High Court At Calcutta)

AJIT GHOSH

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

JAYANTA GHOSH & ORS.

Respondent(s)

IA No. 74565/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date: 19-07-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today.

$CORAM :$

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

For Petitioner(s)Mr. Bharat Sangal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Nagarkatti Kartik Uday, AOR
Ms. Babita Kushwaha, Adv.
Ms. Anindita Deka, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Anjan Datta, Adv.
Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Pawan Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Surendra Singh Rana, Adv.
Mr. Ikshit Singhal, Adv.
Mr. Maneesh Saxena, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Suresh Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Vipin Saxena, Adv.
Mr. Mohit Kaushik, Adv.
Ms. Amita, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Agarwal, Adv.
M/S. Mukesh Kumar Singh And Co., AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER The $\verb|respondent(s)|$ seeks two weeks' time due to

personal difficulty. This adjournment is opposed by

learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that even on the earlier occasion, time was taken by the respondent(s).

By way of indulgence, we defer the hearing of this matter till 27.07.2021 making it clear that no further request for adjournment, at the instance of the respondents, will be entertained, on any count, on the future dates. The respondents must make necessary alternate arrangement even if the learned counsel representing them is in personal difficulty.

(DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(6) - 19 May 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 5 Aug 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 27 Jul 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 19 Jul 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(2) - 17 Nov 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 28 Oct 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view