Sheesh Pal (Dead) vs. Haryana State Industrial And Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Ordinary
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Karol
Stage:
DEFAULT / OTHER MATTERS
Remarks:
Peremptory order (in days) [14], List Before Chamber [If steps are taken, let notice be issued, returnable on 23.09.24]
Listed On:
9 Jun 2024
In:
Chamber
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| <b>ITEM NO.1711</b> | COURT NO.11 | <b>SECTION IV-B</b> | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUPREME COURT OF INDIA<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | |||||||||
| Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 20810-<br>20815/2023 | |||||||||
| SHEESH PAL (DEAD) & ORS. | Petitioner(s) | ||||||||
| <b>VERSUS</b> | |||||||||
| HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND<br>INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION<br><b>LIMITED & ORS.</b><br>Respondent $(s)$ | |||||||||
| <b>WITH</b><br>SLP(C) No. 21209-21222/2023 (IV-B) | |||||||||
| SLP(C) No. 20803-20809/2023 (IV-B)<br>SLP(C) No. 21223-21226/2023 (IV-B)<br>Date: 06-09-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today. | |||||||||
| CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL<br>[IN CHAMBERS] | |||||||||
| For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv. | Mr. Jatin Hooda, Adv. | Mr. B C Bhatt, Adv.<br>Ms. Monica Goel, Adv.<br>Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR<br>Dr. Ajay Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Kaushal Yadav, AOR | Mr. Sunil Kumar Das, Adv.<br>Mr. Nandlal Kumar Mishra, Adv. | ||||||
| Mr. Onkar Nath Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Ram Kishor Singh Yadav, AOR | |||||||||
| For Respondent(s)<br>Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>GĚETÁ J <mark>ŐSI</mark><br>Date: 2024.09.10<br>17:02:20 IST | Mr. Samyak Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.<br>Ms. Drishti Saraf, Adv. | Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G.<br>Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR<br>Ms. Himanshi Shakya, Adv.<br>Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Despite opportunities afforded, petitioners have not taken steps in respect of respondent nos.4 and 5.
Indulgently, last and final opportunity of two weeks is afforded to the petitioners to do the needful failing which, the petitions qua said respondents shall automatically stand dismissed for want of prosecution, without any further reference to the Court. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
If steps are taken, let notice be issued, returnable on 23.09.2024.
(GEETA JOSHI) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)