IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL Nos.4597-4602 OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.20810-20815 of 2023)

SHEESH PAL (DEAD) THR. Lrs. & ORS. ETC.ETC. … APPELLANTS

Versus

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. ETC.ETC. … RESPONDENTS

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL Nos.4603-4616 OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.21209-21222 of 2023)

MAHI PAL & ORS.ETC.ETC. … APPELLANTS

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. … RESPONDENTS

CIVIL APPEAL Nos.4617-4623 OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.20803-20809 of 2023)

VIRENDER KUMAR & ORS. ETC.ETC. … APPELLANTS

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. … RESPONDENTS

CIVIL APPEAL Nos.4624-4627 OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.21223-21226 of 2023)

ASHOK KUMAR ETC.ETC. … APPELLANTS

Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date: 2025.04.05 16:13:30 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

Versus

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. … RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgments dated 07.10.2021 and 21.03.2022, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, whereby the compensation for their acquired land was reduced from Rs.22,00,754/- per acre to Rs.14,52,010/- per acre.

3. The lands of the appellants were acquired by the State of Haryana for construction of the KMP Express Highway Phase VII in village Sultanpur, District Gurugram, Haryana by the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC).

4. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the judgments of the High Court, including the lead judgment in RFA No.421 of 2021, were challenged before this Court in C.A. No. 1173 of 2023 @ SLP(C)No. 3585 of 2022 (Ravinder Kumar Goel vs. The State of Haryana & Ors.) and other connected appeals, which were allowed on 15.02.2023 and the market value of the acquired land was enhanced to Rs.25,20,000/- per acre.

5. Consequently, these appeals are allowed, and the appellants are also held entitled to compensation in terms of judgment dated 15.02.2023, passed by this Court in Ravinder Kumar Goel's case (supra) along with all the statutory benefits.

6. The enhanced amount of compensation shall be paid to the appellants within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

2

7. As a sequel to the above, the pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

....................……...J. (SURYA KANT)

..............……...……......J. (NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH)

NEW DELHI; APRIL 01, 2025.

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.3 SECTION IV-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).20810-20815/2023

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-10-2021 in RFA No.301/2021 07-10-2021 in RFA No.302/2021 07-10-2021 in RFA No.349/2021 07-10-2021 in RFA No.350/2021 07-10-2021 in RFA No. 364/2021 07-10-2021 in RFA No.365/2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh]

SHEESH PAL (DEAD) & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 21209-21222/2023 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 20803-20809/2023 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 21223-21226/2023 (IV-B)

Date : 01-04-2025 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv. Ms. Anisha Dahiya, Adv. Mr. Jatin Hooda, Adv. Mr. Abhaya Nath Das, Adv. Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Mr. Kaushal Yadav, AOR Dr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Nandlal Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Onkar Nath Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ritul Tandon, Adv. Mr. Ram Kishor Singh Yadav, AOR Ms. Priyanka Yadav, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. Mr. Shikhar Narwal, Adv. Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Adv.

Ms. Drishti Saraf, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Leave granted.

The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed order.

As a sequel to the above, the pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file)