Reserve Bank Of India General Manager vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble R.K. Agrawal
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:4 Sept 2013
CNR:SCIN010145762012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

18 May 2012

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

\226( ITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 707-718 OF 2012 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYANTILAL N. MISTRY ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for stay,exemption and office report) Date: 04/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kuldeep S. Parihar, Adv. Mr. H.S. Parihar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.K. Ray, Adv. Ms. Jaya Sree Narasimhan, Adv. Mr. P. Narasimhan,Adv. Ms. I. Abenla Aier, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sangal ,Adv Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan ,Adv Mr. A. Rasheed Qureshi, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha ,Adv Mr. Vivek Gupta ,Adv Mr. Surender M. Sharma, Adv. Ms. Manisha T.Karia ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R TP(C) No.707 and 718/2012 Certificate of service in respect of the sole respondent is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued on urgent priority basis. Item No.28 -2- TP(C) No.708/2012 Respondent No.1 is granted three weeks' time, as final chance, for filing counter affidavit on record. The learned Advocate, Ms. I. Abenla Aier, appearing on behalf of Mr. Bharat Sangal, Advocate-on-Record for respondent No.3 has made a submission at Bar that no counter affidavit is required to be filed. Certificate of service in respect of respondent No.2 is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued on urgent priority basis. TP(C) No.709/2012 Certificate of service in respect of both the respondents is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued on urgent priority basis. TP(C) No.710/2012 The learned counsel for the sole respondent has made a submission at Bar that he would be filing the counter affidavit in two days alongwith the proper application as his two chances have been already exhausted. It is pertinent to note that copy of the counter affidavit has been already served on the learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to take note and take appropriate steps accordingly.

Item No.28 -3- TP(C) No.711/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, a submission at Bar has been advanced by the learned Advocate, Ms.Jaya Sree Narasimhan, appearing on behalf of Mr. P. Narasimhan, Advocate-on-Record that no counter affidavit is required to be filed on record. Respondent No.2 has failed to file counter affidavit within the time granted by the Court. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. TP(C) Nos.712 and 713/2012 In these two matters, submission on behalf of the common sole respondent has been advanced that no counter affidavit is required to be filed on record. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. TP(C) No.715/2012 Sole respondent is reported to be duly and properly served through the concerned High Court but none appeared on his behalf. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. TP(C) No.714/2012 All the three respondents are reported to be duly Item No.28 -4 and properly served through the concerned High Court but none appeared on their behalf. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. TP(C) No.716/2012 Certificate of service in respect of respondent No.1 is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued on urgent priority basis. On behalf of respondent No.2, a submission has been advanced by the learned Advocate, Ms. Jaya Sree Narasimhan that no counter affidavit is required to be filed on record. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. TP(C) No.717/2012 The learned counsel for the sole respondent has made a submission at Bar that no counter affidavit is required to be filed on record. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. List again on 4.10.2013. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | | | | |

rd

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(25) - 4 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 30 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 30 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 13 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 13 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 3 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 3 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 17 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 17 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 14 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 14 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 25 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 17 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 28 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 13 Dec 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 19 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 4 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 4 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(7) - 18 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 10 May 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 8 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 1 Nov 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 24 Aug 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 10 Jul 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 4 Jul 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view