Reserve Bank Of India General Manager vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
18 May 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Ä ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 707-718 OF 2012 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYANTILAL N. MISTRY ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for stay,exemption and office report) Date: 18/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kuldeep S. Parihar, Adv. Mr. H.S. Parihar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.K. Ray, Adv. Mr. P. Narasimhan,Adv. Mr. I. Abenla Aier, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sangal ,Adv Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan ,Adv Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha ,Adv Mr. K.R. Anand, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gupta ,Adv Mr. S.M. Sharma, Adv. Ms. Manisha T.Karia ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R TP(C) No.707 and 718/2012 Service report in respect of the sole respondent is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued. TP(C) No.708/2012 Respondent Nos.1 and 3 are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit on record. Item No.32 -2- Service report in respect of respondent No.2 is awaited from the High Court. Reminder be issued. TP(C) No.709/2012 Service report in respect of both the respondents is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued. TP(C) No.710/2012 Sole respondent has failed to file counter affidavit within the time granted by the Court. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. TP(C) No.711/2012 Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have failed to file counter affidavit within the time granted by the Court. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. TP(C) No.712 and 713/2012 The matter is complete in all respects. It would not be out of place to mention here that the learned counsel for the respondent had already made a submission at Bar that no counter affidavit is required to be filed on record, as reflected from the order passed on 10.5.2013.
Item No.32 -3- Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. TP(C) No.714/2012 Service report in respect of all the respondents is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued. TP(C) No.715/2012 Sole respondent is reported to be duly and properly served through concerned High Court but no one has put appearance on his behalf. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. TP(C) No.716/2012 Service report in respect of respondent No.1 is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.2, as a final chance, for filing counter affidavit on record. TP(C) No.717/2012 Four weeks' time is granted to the sole respondent, as a final chance, for filing counter affidavit on record. List again on 4.9.2013. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | |rd | | |