Reserve Bank Of India General Manager vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry

ITEM NO.2 Court No.9 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 25-26 in TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 707-718 OF 2012 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYANTILAL N. MISTRY ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With office report )) Date: 08/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. T.R.Andhyarujina, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kuldeep S.Parihar, Adv. Mr. H.S. Parihar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rakesh Mudgal, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. Narasimhan,Adv. Ms. Jayashree Narasimha, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sangal ,Adv Ms. Namrata Sharma, Adv. Ms.Srijana Lama, Adv. Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan ,Adv Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha ,Adv Ms. Sevtlana C., Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta ,Adv Mr. K.R.Anand, Adv. Mr. Jagbir S.Malik, adv. Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gupta ,Adv Ms. Manisha T.Karia ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Learned counsel for the proposed respondent i.e. -2- National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development has no objection to the addition of the Bank as a party respondent in T.P.(C) No. 707- 718 of 2012. We accordingly order the application and add NABARD as a party respondent. Objections may be filed by the respondent including the newly added respondent within four weeks.

Notice shall also issue in terms of Order XXXVI Rule 2 of

ô

the Supreme Court Rules. Post after the service is complete,

|(Shashi Sareen) | |(Sneh Lata Sharma) | |Court Master | |Court Master |