Lukas Shylla vs. The State Of Meghalaya . Represented By The Chief Secretary Government Of Meghalaya
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
29 Jun 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.14
SECTION X
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A. 3/2016 in Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s).393/2016
MANBHA KYNDOH & ORS. $\mathcal{L}$
Petitioner(s)
$Respondent(s)$
VERSUS
STATE OF MEGHALAYA
(For impleadment as party respondent and office report)
Date: 07/11/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD [IN CHAMBERS]
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shaurya Sahay, Adv. For Mr. Amit Kumar, AOR
| For Respondent(s)/ | ||
|---|---|---|
| Applicant(s) | Mr. A. Henry, Adv. | |
| Mr. A. Rohen Singh, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Philemon Nongbri, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Vivek Kumar, Adv. | ||
| Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR | ||
Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
An application for impleadment filed by the applicant is not opposed either by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners or by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State of Meghalaya.
I.A. No.3 of 2016 is accordingly allowed in terms of the prayer 'a' thereof.
SignatureNot Verified Learned counsel shall file amended memo of parties in the $\frac{1}{2}$
(RASHI GUPTA) SR. P. A.
(MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER