Atla Ananda Rao And Etc vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Department Principal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.601 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13623/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/03/2017 in WP No. 21678/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh)
A. VEERRAJU AND ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief)
WITH SLP(C) No. 13707-13708/2017 (With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim relief)
Date : 27/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Jayant Bhushan,Sr.Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. A. Ramesh,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Syed Ahmad Naqvi,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Anil Babu,Adv. | ||
| Ms. Shilpi Gupta,Adv. | ||
| Mr. A. Venayagam Balan,Adv. | ||
| Mr. R. Basant,Sr.Adv. | ||
| Mr. A. Ramesh,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Anil Babu,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Syed Ahmad Naqvi,Adv. | ||
| Ms. Shilpi Gupta,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Ganni Krishna,Adv. | ||
Mr. B. Ramana Murthy,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Digitally signed by NARENDRA PRASAD Date: 2017.04.27
Signature Not Verified
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that in the Government and Government aided private institutions, 17:57:15 IST Reason:
retirement age is 60 years. Respondent No.3/The Andhra Pradesh State Tribal Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society (Gurukulam) is a wholly Government owned Society. Therefore, the teachers in the Respondent No.3/Society (Gurukulam) cannot be discriminated. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the High Court has given a period of four weeks for taking a decision in the case of those institutions where retirement age has not yet been enhanced to 60 years; whereas in the case of Respondent No.3/Society (Gurukulam) a decision has already been taken and what is required is only the formal expression of the decision in the form of an appropriate legislation.
Issue notice only to contesting respondents, returnable on 31.07.2017.
In the above circumstances, until further orders, the superannuation in the case of those teachers on attaining the age of 58 years in Respondent No.3/Society (Gurukulam) shall be deferred.
(NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN)
COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR