Delhi Elect. Regult. Commission vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Ü ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 8660-8661/2015 DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION ETC. ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing official english translation and office report) Date : 02/11/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Appellant(s) Mr. Pradeep Misra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vishal Anand,Adv. Mr. Sambit Panja,Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar Vats,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The substantial question of law framed in order to seek admission of the appeals, in the considered view of the Court, do not give rise to any such issue of law which would require an authoritative pronouncement answer from the Court. On the aforesaid sole ground itself, thes appeals are liable to be dismissed. However, as th learned counsel for the appellant has prayed for time to explore as to whether there could be any other substantial Signature Not Verified question(s) of law, the matters are adjourned for eight Digitally signed by Madhu Bala Date: 2015.11.02 17:12:27 IST Reason: weeks. (MADHU BALA) (ASHA SONI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER Ü ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 8660-8661/2015 DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION ETC. ETC. Appellant(s)
e
e
| VERSUS | |
|---|---|
| translation and office report) | BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ETC. ETC.<br>Respondent(s)<br>(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing official english |
| Date : 02/11/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. | |
| CORAM : | HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA |
| For Appellant(s) | Mr. Pradeep Misra,Adv. |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr.<br>Vishal Anand,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Sambit Panja,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Sumit Kumar Vats,Adv. |
| UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | |
| The substantial question of law framed in order to | |
| seek admission of the appeals, in the considered view of | |
| the Court, do not give rise to any such issue of law which | |
| would require an authoritative pronouncement answer from | |
| e | the<br>Court.<br>On<br>the<br>aforesaid<br>sole<br>ground<br>itself,<br>thes |
| e | appeals<br>are<br>liable<br>to<br>be<br>dismissed.<br>However,<br>as<br>th |
| learned counsel for the appellant has prayed for time to | |
| explore as to whether there could be any other substantial | |
| Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>Madhu Bala<br>Date: 2015.11.02 | question(s) of law,<br>the matters are adjourned for eight |
| 17:12:27 IST<br>Reason: | weeks. |
(MADHU BALA) (ASHA SONI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER