Sat Narain vs. The State Of Haryana State Of Haryana Through Collector
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Text
ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 (CC 12986-12987/2012) (From the judgement and order dated 05/11/2009 in RFA No.1136/1998, dated 21/05/2010 in RFA No.1136/1998,CM No.2204/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) RANBIR & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A.1-2 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 13230-13231 of 2012 (For substitution and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file SLP and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file additional documents and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 13472-13473 of 2012 With I.A.1-2 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 13551 of 2012 (For substitution and permission to file SLP and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and office report) Date: 15/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE For Petitioner(s) Mr.Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Shri Shish Pal Laler, learned counsel for the petitioner
requests for an adjournment to enable his client to offer cogent explanation for the delay in filing of substitution applications. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the cases are adjourned for four weeks.
(Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order