Aggunna Baburao And Ors Etc Etc vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh School Education Department Principal Secreatary

COURT NO.7

ITEM NO.33 $+$ 60

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . $\hbox{\tt for}$ 14033-14034/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/03/2017 in WP No. 31644/2016 08/03/2017 in WP No. 32777/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh)

K ANAND RAO ETC

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS

Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned <pre>judgment and interim relief and office report)</pre>

WITH

SLP(C) No. $14101/2017$ (With appln for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned Judgment <pre>and Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre> SLP(C) No. $14184/2017$ (With appln for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned Judgment <pre>and Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre>

with

SLP (C) No. 14237 of 2017 (With appln for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned Judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP (C) No. 14359 of 2017 (With appln for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned Judgment <pre>and Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre> SLP (C) No. 14469 of 2017 (With appln for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned Judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP (C) No. 14515-14516 of 2017 (With appln for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned Judgment <pre>and Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre> SLP (C) ...CC No. 9468 of 2017 Signally state of the impugned Judgment Relief and Office Report) $\frac{1}{2}$ SHP (C) No. 14681 of 2017 (With appln for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned Judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP (C) No. 14684-14691 of 2017 (With appln for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned Judgment

and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP (C) No. 14699-14702 of 2017 (With appln for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 05/05/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI Counsel for the parties Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv. Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, Adv. Ms. Vismai Rao, Adv. Mr. K. Sharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Mr. A. Ramesh, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Syed Ahmad Naqvi, Adv. Ms. Shilpi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ganni Krishna, Adv. Mr. B. Ramana Murthy, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are similarly situated persons as in SLP (C) No. 13623 of 2017 and they are also working under the institutions promoted by the State Government.

In view of the above submission, issue notice.

Until further orders, the superannuation in the case of employees on attaining the age of 58 years in the respondent-institutions shall be deferred.

Needless to say that in case any employee has retired only on the ground of attaining the age of 58 years, such employees shall be reinstated and continued in service until further orders, but in no case, beyond 60 years.

2

We also make it clear that this order will apply to all similarly situated employees under the respondent-institutions whether they are the petitioners before this Court or not and, therefore, those similarly situated persons need not travel to this Court.

Tag with SLP (C) No. 13623 of 2017.

(Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master

(Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar