The Anubhava Mantapa Trust By Secretary vs. C. R. Hiremath (D) Thr. Lrs.

ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 11893-11894/2014 THE ANUBHAVA MANTAPA TRUST BY SECRETARY Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.R.HIREMATH (D) THR.LRS. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 12399-12400/2014 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 16/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. Mr Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Adv. M/s. Nuli & Nuli,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.11893/2014 Opportunity to respondent no.9 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent nos. 1a to 1d, 2a to 2d, 3 to 5 have already filed counter affidavit. -2- Item No.16 None appears for respondent nos. 6 to 8 despite due service. Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. SLP(C) No.11894/2014 Respondent nos. 1a to 1d, 2 and 3 have already filed counter affidavit. None appears for respondent nos. 4,6 and 7 despite due service. Opportunity to respondent no.5 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. SLP(C) No.12399/2014 Respondent nos. 1 to 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Opportunity to respondent nos.12 and 13 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent no 14 despite due service. Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. SLP(C) No.12400/2014 Respondent nos. 1 to 4,8 and 9 have already filed counter affidavit. None appears for respondent nos.10 to 12 despite due service. -3- Item No.16 Despite last opportunity having been granted, petitioner has not clarified the position as to the status of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 in terms of the previous order. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers alongwith appropriate office report showing the status of the respondents in all the matters and the inconsistency as to respondent nos. 5 and 6. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL)

Registrar