Election Commission Tamil Nadu State Co Operative Societies vs. R. Sakkarapani
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
20 Apr 2018
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10051-10059/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-04-2018 in WMP No.7255/2018 09-04-2018 in WMP No.7254/2018 09-04-2018 in WMP No.7253/2018 12-04-2018 in WMP No.7255/2018 12-04-2018 in WMP No.7254/2018 12-04-2018 in WMP No.7253/2018 12-04-2018 in WPMD No. 6909/2018 12-04-2018 in WPMD No.7186/2018 12-04-2018 in WPMD No. 7620/2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras at Madurai)
ELECTION COMMISSION TAMIL NADU STATE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
R. SAKKARAPANI & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
Diary No(s). 14687/2018 (XII)
Date : 20-04-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
For Petitioner(s) Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr.M.S.Palaniswamy, Adv. Mr.Karuna Karan, Adv. Mr.M.Thangathurai, Adv. Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Adv. Mr.Sidhartha Iyer, Adv. Mr.Himanshu Pal, Adv.
Mr.Subramonium Prasad, Sr.Adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR Mr.A.Sriram, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, AOR Mr.P.Mahendran, Adv. Mr.Shashwat Singh, Adv. Ms.Harshal Gupta, Adv. Mr.B.Karuna Karan, Adv. Digitally signed by CHETAN KUMAR Date: 2018.04.20 17:59:09 TLT Reason: Signature Not Verified
ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, Mr.Subramonium Prasad, learned senior counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu and Mr.Amit Anand Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent.
It is submitted by Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel that the High Court has erred in law while staying the ongoing election process. Per contra, Mr.Amit Anand Tiwari, learned counsel would contend that approximately 1,40,000 people had filed their nomination papers out of which approximately 70,000 nomination papers have been accepted. It is his further submission that these all 70,000 persons whose nomination papers have been accepted inevitably shall be elected un-opposed. This fact is disputed by Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel for the petitioners.
Let an affidavit be filed by the first respondent, in this regard, by giving proper data, within a week hence.
The assisting counsel of Mr.Mukul Rohatgi and Mr. Subramonium Prasad, learned senior counsel shall also file an affidavit in this regard.
Let the matter be listed on 03.05.2018.
In the meantime, the voting shall take place but no result shall be declared without the leave of this Court.
(Chetan Kumar ) (H.S.Parasher) Court Master Assistant Registrar