Suresh Kumar (D) Thr. Lrs. vs. Shiv Kumar (D) Thr. Lrs

0 ITEM NO.103 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 4677/2012 SURESH KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS SHIV KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 12/05/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms.Debjani Das Parkayastha,adv. M/s. Delhi Law Chambers,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Rajat Kapoor,adv. Mr. Anis Ahmed Khan,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the respondents has already filed the statement of case. The office report further is that the Ld.counsel for the appellants has failed to file the statement of case within the period stipulated in the order dated 26.02.2015 of this Court. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition Signature Not Verified for seeking special leave to appeal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case,and does not desire to Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2015.05.14 16:08:54 IST Reason: file any further statement of case. ..........2 ITEM NO.103 -2-

In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar