Bommidi Laxmi Tulasi vs. Union Of India
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:10 Oct 2014
CNR:SCIN010141572014
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
19 Sept 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.25 | COURT NO.7 | SECTION XIIA | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | ||||||||
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)CC<br>No(s).<br>16117/2014 | |||||||||
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013<br>in WP No. 10027/2001 passed by the High Court Of Judicature of A.P.<br>At Hyderabad) | |||||||||
) | BOMMIDI LAXMI TULASI | Petitioner(s | |||||||
VERSUS | |||||||||
) | UNION OF INDIA & ORS | Respondent(s | |||||||
(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling<br>SLP and office report) | |||||||||
Date : 10/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. | |||||||||
CORAM : | HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | ||||||||
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, Adv.<br>Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. | ||||||||
For Respondent(s) | |||||||||
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | |||||||||
n | a | Heard | Delay condoned.<br>learned | counsel | for | the | petitioner. | O | |
Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>Naveen Kumar<br>Date: 2014.10.10 | perusal of the order passed by the High Court, we find<br>that it has declined to grant terminal benefit on the<br>foundation that the petitioner has already been removed<br>from service.<br>A grievance has been made by the petitioner that he<br>has not yet been served with the order of removal. Be that | ||||||||
Reason: | 16:16:02 IST | as it may, it is directed that the copy of the order of | |||||||
n<br>opy | a | removal<br>2 | shall<br>be<br>period of six weeks from the date of presentation | supplied | to | the | petitioner | withi<br>of c | |
of | this<br>order<br>before<br>thereafter it will be open to the petitioner to challenge<br>the order of removal. | the | Competent<br>Needless to emphasise, if the order | Authority | and |
of removal is assailed before the Appellate Authority, it shall advert to the same on merits and decide within a period of three months from the date of filing and should not throw it at the threshold on the ground of limitation. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the special leave petition stands disposed of.
(NAVEEN KUMAR) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search