Sobhagya Singh Shekhawat And Ors. Etc vs. State Of Rajasthan And Ors. Etc. Through Its Secretary To The Government Department Of Education

6 ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.3 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8164-8166/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/08/2013 in DBCWP No. 3480/2012,02/08/2013 in DBCWP No. 5641/2012,29/11/2013 in DBCMR No. 193/2013,17/01/2014 in DBCMR No. 192/2013,17/01/2014 in DBCWP No. 5641/2012,29/11/2013 in DBCWP No. 3480/2012 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jaipur) SOBHAGYA SINGH SHEKHAWAT & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp and office report) Date : 07/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed ,Adv. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the institute in which the petitioners were employed as teachers continued to remain on the Govt. list of aided institutions till 01st March, 2012 when the same was dropped from the list. He Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by argued Shashi Sareen Date: 2014.07.11 16:41:37 IST that although the management of the institute had Reason: declined to receive any aid from the year 2008 onwards, the decision to do so was unilateral and could not prejudice the interest of the employees. He urges that the case of the petitioner is different from the case of the other petitioners in the batch of cases disposed of by the High Court which were

unaided institutions and did not therefore qualify for

regularisation of the employees working therein.

Issue notice.

(NEELAM GULATI) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER