The State Of Orissa vs. Dharmendra Saha
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
28 Oct 2020
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
1
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 14088/2020
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-05-2019 in BLAPL No. 1380/2018 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack)
THE STATE OF ORISSA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DHARMENDRA SAHA Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.69014/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.69015/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.69016/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 28-10-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.V.Raju,ASG Ms. Sairica Raju,Adv. Mr. Aniriudh Sanganeria,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Applications for exemption from filing c/c of the
impugned judgment and official translation are allowed.
IA No.69014/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
The impugned order is dated 17th May, 2019 in terms whereof bail has been granted to the respondent in a
case under Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2020.10.28 19:27:41 IST Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Act. Learned Additional Solicitor General sought to impress us with the importance of the matter by saying that in view of the provisions of Section 37 of the Act, there is bar to grant of bail in such cases especially where large quantities of ganja have been seized. He also seeks to submit by reference to the impugned order that these aspects have not been dealt with in the impugned order.
We do find some substance on the merits of what the learned ASG has advanced before us. But there is a threshold bar for the petitioner in view of a delay of 328 days which we want to deal with now.
This is not the only case but many cases are coming before this Court from different Government agencies after inordinate delays showing complete inefficiency in administration of their legal departments. That the same should happen to the legal department of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) reflects an even sadder situation! In an order recently passed in S.L.P. (Civil)Diary No.9217 of 2020 - State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bheru Lal dated 15th October, 2020, we have dealt with this approach and have observed that these pedantic excuses are no more admissible in view of the technology which is now assisting even the Government agencies and have referred to the judgment of this Court in the case of Office of the Chief Post Master General & Ors. v. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. (2012) 3 SCC 563. Eight
2
years have passed since that judgment, but still any counsel as advanced in that judgment seems unheeded!
A reading of the application for condonation of delay shows that on 1st July, 2019 the Kolkata Zone submitted the initial proposal to file SLP to the NCB headquarters, after examination and along with the view of the Assistant Legal Adviser, NCB headquarter, the matter was sent to JS & LA, Ministry of law on 16.09.2019 after two and a half months. On 08.11.2019, NCB officer sent the vetted SLP with annexures to NCB headquarters for the necessary action and the same was received by the Central Agency Section on 04.02.2020 i.e. about three months. We have no doubt that officers have been grossly negligent in conduct of the legal affairs of the department.
We have also in the judgment in Bheru Lal's case (supra) referred to the cases which can be categorized as "certificate cases". The object is to obtain certificate of dismissal from the Supreme Court to put a quietus to the issue, and thus, say that nothing could be done because the highest Court has dismissed the appeal. It is an endeavour to complete formality to save the skin of the officers who may be at default in such process to be followed in time. We are not willing to countenance this anymore.
3
We are thus, inclined to impose cost on the petitioner/Narcotics Controal Bureau of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) to be deposited with the Mediation and Conciliation Project Committee within a period of four weeks. The amount be recovered from the officer/officers responsible for the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition and a certificate of recovery of the said amount will also be filed in this Court within the said period of time.
Notice returnable in three weeks subject to the aforesaid.
S.L.P.(Criminal) Diary No(s). 14088/2020
Notice subject to the orders be passed in the aforesaid application for condonation of delay, returnable in three weeks.
(ANITA MALHOTRA) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
4