Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd Through Assistant General Manager (Legal)& Ors. vs. Kewalkrishan& Ors.

but he is alive and no need to take any steps. The respondent Nos.1, 3-5, 7-12 and 14 have already filed the

counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.2, $6(a)$ to $6(e)$ and respondent No.13, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

SignatureNot VerinViewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before He Hon'ble Court as per rules.

$(M V RAMESH)$ Registrar

Mr.Shashank Shekhar Singh, Ld.counsel appearing on behalf of

the petitioner has stated that it was wrongly stated by Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate on 02.01.2017 that the respondent No.5 has expired,

ORDER

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

For Respondent(s) Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv.

• Mr.Shashank Shekhar Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv.
• Mr.Amitesh Kumar,Adv.
• For Petitioner(s)

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20692/2014 BSNL & ORS. $\epsilon$ Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SHAM LAL & ORS. $\epsilon$

(with office report)

Date : $01/02/2017$ This petition was called on for hearing today.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SECTION IVB

ITEM NO.13

$Respondent(s)$