Natthu Singh (Dead Thr Lrs. ) vs. State Of Utter Pradesh Through Principal Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:23 Oct 2017
CNR:SCIN010140662017

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). /2017 Diary No(s). 14066/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-01-2017 in CWP No. 3734/2017 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)

NATTHU SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.87978/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No.87986/2017-APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT SETTING AISDE IN THE FILING THE SUBSTITUTION APPLICATION. IA No.87980/2017-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No.87985/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No.87979/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP IA No.87981/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. and IA No.87982/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING)

Date : 23-10-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikram Patralekh, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners

and perused the relevant material.

Delay in filing the application for substitution

is condoned and abatement is set aside.

Application for substitution are allowed subject

to all just exceptions.

Permission to file special leave petition is granted.

Delay in filing and refiling the special leave petition is condoned.

The persons entitled to relief of enhanced compensation in terms of the order dated 30.11.2016 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No.11501 of 2016 has been specified in the order. The petitioners are not covered by the said order. The special leave petition is, therefore, dismissed.

(NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER

(ASHA SONI) BRANCH OFFICER