Tarun Joshi vs. The State Of Uttarakhand State Of Uttarakhand . The Principal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)
Listed On:
14 Nov 2017
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR
IA $1/2017$ , $2/2017$ , in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No $(s)$ . 8633/2017
THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT GOVERNMENT OF UTTARAKHAND PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
IN THE MATTER OF THE PROTECTION OF FOREST ENVIRONMENT ECOLOGY WILDLIFE ETC. FROM THE FOREST FIRE Respondent(s)
(FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA $1/2017$ FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 2/2017)
WITH SLP(C) No. $15477/2017$ (X)
Date: 14-11-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Ms.Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mr. Vivek Singh, AOR Mr.Shashank Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra S. Garia, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr.Sanjay Katyal, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
SLP(C) No. $8633/2017$
Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1 & 2, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
The respondent No.3 has failed to file the counter affidavit despite opportunities given. However, at the request of Ld.counsel, $\mathbb{F}$ ar weeks time as last and final opportunity is given to file the same. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules after expiry of four weeks.
$\dots\ldots\ldots2$
SLP(C) No. 15477/2017
Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1-5, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr.Sanjay Katyal, Ld.counsel undertakes to appear for the respondent No.4. He seeks and is given four week's time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.
Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps in the respect of the respondent No.6 despite opportunities given. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter.
SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar
SB