Lt. Col. (Retd. ) Priyamvada A Mardikar vs. Union Of India Secretary

TTEM NO. $110$

COURT NO.1

SECTION XIV

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 9367-9369/2011

SECR., MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

Appellant(s)

VERSUS

BABITA PUNIYA & ANR.& ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment and office report)

WITH

C.A. No. $79-82/2012$ (With appln.(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for permission to file additional <pre>documents and Office Report)</pre>

C.A. No. $83-84/2012$ (With Office Report)

C.A. No. 192-196/2012 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for impleadment as <pre>petitioner and Office Report)</pre>

$SLP(C)$ No. 20638/2015 (With Office Report)

C.A. No. $5164/2012$ (With Office Report)

C.A. No. $3151/2012$ (With Office Report)

C.A. No. 1127-1128/2013 (With Office Report)

C.A. D 31542/2013 (With appln.(s) for leave to appeal $u/s$ 31(1) of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 and Office Report)

Date : $11/02/2016$ These appeals were called on for hearing today.

$\frac{\text{Signal}}{\text{Area}} \frac{\text{NOR}}{\text{A}}$

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Appellant(s)

Mr. Sriodhar Potaraju, Adv. (In C.A.No.79-82 Mr. S.S. Pandey, Adv. OF $2012$ ) Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei, Adv.

	Mr. Abhishek R. Shukla, Adv.
	Mr. Arjun Singh, Adv.
	Mr. A. Makunda Rao, Adv.
	Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG
(For UoI)	Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv.
	Mr. R. Bala, Adv.
	Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv.
	Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Adv.
	Mr. B.V. Balramdas, Adv.
	Mr. Anil Kumar Bakshi, Adv.
	Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv.
	Mr. Anupam Raina, ADv
	Mrs. Rekha Palli, Adv.
	Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
	Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv.
	Mr. T. Gopal, Adv.
	Mr. Lopamudra Tandon, Adv.
	Ms. Eshita Kapur, Adv.
	Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv.
	Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv.
	Mr. Raghvendra Mishra, Adv.
	Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Adv.
	UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R

Learned counsel for the parties point out that respondents in some of the matters still remain unserved.

The Registry is directed to look into the matter and take fresh steps for effective service on the unserved respondents.

List after the needful is done.

(Ashok Raj Singh)	(Veena Khera)
Court Master	Court Master