The State Of Kerala Transport Department By Its Secretary vs. L. Srinivasa Babu& Ors.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
° ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13838/2010 STATE OF KERALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS L. SRINIVASA BABU & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for intervention,permission to file additional documents,PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL AFFIDAVIT and prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 16588 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 24865-24866 of 2012 (With office report) Date: 27/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Bina Madhavan,Adv. Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, Adv. Ms. Namrata Sood, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E.C. Vidya Sagar,Adv. Mr. S. Wasim Qadri, Adv. Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh ,Adv Ms. Anitha Shenoy ,Adv Mr. Abu John Mathew, Adv. Mr. P.S.Sudheer ,Adv Mr. Samir Ali Khan ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.13838/2010 In the present SLP, the intervention application has come on record and notice on respondent Nos.8, 11, 15 and 16 is awaited. Item No.26 -2- The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the Intervenor to take necessary steps, as per rules. It would not be out of place to mention here that service on the respondent in the main matter is complete, as reflected from the office report. Respondent No.10 is granted four weeks' time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit on record. SLP(C) NO. 16588 of 2010 The duly represented respondents have failed to file counter affidavit within the time granted by the Court and as permissible under the rules. No further steps required. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. SLP(C) NO. 24865-24866 of 2012 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.1 has already come on record. Respondent No.2 is reported to be duly and properly served but none appeared on his behalf. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready.
List again on 4.10.2013. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
(M.A. SAYEED) | ||||
REGISTRAR | ||||
rd |