Prakash Madhukar Pathak vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION XI-A
ITEM NO.33
COURT NO.1
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.9610/2019
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2018 in WPC No. 602/2015 12-10-2018 in WPC No.13120/2015 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam)
THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SUNIL KUMAR B & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, exemption from filing <pre>c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief)</pre>
Date: 01-04-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Keshav Mohan, Adv.<br>Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Rishi K. Awasthi, Adv.<br>Mr. Santosh Kumar - I, AOR | |
---|---|
For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR<br>Mr. Anu K. Joy, Adv.<br>Mr. Alam Anvar, Adv. | |
Dr. K.P. Kylasanatha Pillay, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR<br>Mr. V.S. Lakshmi, Adv. | |
Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv.<br>Ms. Seema Jain, Adv.<br>Mr. Himinder Lal, Adv. | |
Mr. E.M.S. Anam, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
learned counsel for the petitioners Heard $\quad\text{and}\quad$ perused the relevant material.
2
Delay condoned.
We find no merit in the special leave petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(Chetan Kumar) (Anand Prakash) A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master