Union Of India And Ors. Etc. Through Its Secretary vs. Rashmi Metaliks Limited And Anr. Etc. Through Director

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 832-854/2015 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RASHMI METALIKS LIMITED AND ANR. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for stay and office report) (For final disposal) Date: 19/02/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravinder Srivastava, Sr. Adv. Ms. N. Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Satija, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG Mr. R. Bala Subramanian, Adv. Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Adv. Mr. Nalin Kohli, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. D.L. Chidananda, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradip T., Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pradip Kumar Ghosh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pradip Kr. Tarafder, Adv. Mrs. M.V. Rama, Adv. Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari,Adv. Mr. J.K. Ghosh, Adv. Signature Not Verified Mr. Biplal Sharma, Sr. Adv. Digitally signed by Vinod Kumar Date: 2016.02.20 10:08:27 IST Reason: Mr. R.B. Phookan, Adv. Mr. D. Manna, Adv. Mr. H. Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Rohit Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal,Adv. -2- Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Rath, Adv. Mr. Arun Sehgal, Adv. Mr. S. S. Shroff,Adv.

Mr. Naveen Chawla, Adv.

8( ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVIA

Ms. Akshara Sharma, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Patra, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Chawla, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev K. Kapoor, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co., Adv. Mr. Vivek C., Adv. Mr. Asif Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per Office Report, service is not complete on some of the matters. We direct the Registry to complete the service within a period of two weeks from today. In the meantime, all the pleadings, in respect of those parties who have already been served in the matter, should be exchanged between the parties. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General has informed that he has not been supplied the copy of counter affidavit in the matters. We direct the learned counsel appearing for the respondents to immediately supply the copy of counter affidavit to learned Solicitor General. As prayed by Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General, permission to file rejoinder affidavit is granted in the matter. It has been informed by Mr. Jayant Bhushan, learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondent that some of the matters have wrongly been tagged with these matters. In view of above, we make it clear that the matters which are not connected with these matters and wrongly tagged, those -3 matters will also be heard and appropriate orders in respect of those matters will be passed on the next date of hearing. As jointly prayed by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, list the matters after four weeks.

(VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER