Shahed Kamal vs. Pagarani Universal Infrastructure Private Limited

ITEM $NO.38$

COURT NO.9

SECTION IX

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

<u>Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.8837/2022</u>

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-03-2022 in APL No. 8104/2020 passed by the High Court of Judicature at <pre>Bombay)</pre>

SHAHED KAMAL & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

PAGARANI UNIVERSAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE $Respondent(s)$ LIMITED & ORS.

(IA No. 71731/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

WITH

Diary No(s). $14132/2022$ (X)

(FOR ADMISSION & IA No. 175434/2022 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING)

Date : 03-03-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.

$CORAM$ :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI

For Petitioner(s)

	Mr. Ajay Panicker, Adv.
	Mr. Sureshan P., AOR
	Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Adv.
	Mr. Joseph Sebastian, Adv.
	Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Adv.
For Respondent( $s$ )
nature Not Verified	Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR
	Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General
	Mr. Kanu Agrawal, AOR
	Mr. Digvijay Dam, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Diary No.14132/2022:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record.

Delay condoned.

Issue notice returnable on 24042023.

Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.

Liberty is granted to serve the standing counsel for the State of Maharashtra.

The instructing counsel of Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General, viz. Mr. Kanu Agrawal, accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No.8 – Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority.

Service to the said respondent is thus waived off.

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.8837/2022:

In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking adjournment for filing rejoinder affidavit, list the matter on 24042023.

(VISHAL ANAND) (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH)