Mohamed Arif Jameel vs. The State Of Karnataka
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Manoj Misra, Hon'ble Aravind Kumar
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
IA Allowed [996/2023,997/2023,999/2023,1000/2023], List along with case [SCD39669/2022], Adjourned for [D:0,W:4,M:0]
Listed On:
13 Feb 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.15
COURT NO.2
SECTION IV-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 13760/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-04-2022 in WP No. 6795/2022 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru)
MOHAMED ARIF JAMEEL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.997/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.999/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.996/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.1000/2023-APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT )
Date: 13-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
For Petitioner(s) | Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR | |
---|---|---|
Mr. Rahamathulla Kothwal, Adv. | ||
Ms. Siddika Aisha, Adv. | ||
Mr. Sachin Pahwa, Adv. | ||
Ms. Reeta Puniya, Adv. | ||
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Puneet Jain, Adv. | |
Mr. Vikram Phadke, Adv. | ||
Mr. Ashwin V. Kotemath, Adv. | ||
Mr. Harisha S.r., AOR | ||
Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Adv. | ||
Ms. Akhila Wali, Adv. | ||
Mr. Shiva Swaroop, Adv. | ||
Mr. Dharm Singh, Adv. | ||
Mr. Mallahariah K., Adv. | ||
Mr. S. Shiva Swaroop, Adv. | ||
nature Not Verified | M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR | |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following | ||
R D E R | ||
Delay condoned.
Applications for exemption from filing c/c of
Petitioner(s)
the impugned judgment, official translation and from filing original Vakalatnama/other documents are allowed.
An adjournment letter has been circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Adjourned by four weeks.
A mentioning is made on behalf of the petitioner in SLP [C] Diary No.39669/2022 which is stated to be arising from the same order.
List the SLP [C] Diary No.39669/2022 also along with the present case subject to clearing of defects.
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)