National Highways Authority Of India vs. Udaya Kumar
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [04]
Listed On:
24 Aug 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
63293/2020,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.8
SECTION XI
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.34553/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-04-2023 in ARBC No. 106/2022 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad, U.P.)
UNION OF INDIA
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
GAJENDER & ANR.
$Respondent(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.195231/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SLP and IA No.195234/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 16-10-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
$CORAM :$
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. Prateek Madnani, Adv. Mr. Sumit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Akshay Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Nimish Goel, Adv. Mr. Anupam Pandey, Adv. Ms. Shubhi Dhiman, Adv. Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.R, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
$\mathbf{1}$ Heard the learned Solicitor General appearing for Union of India and perused the material placed on record.
Signaffect Verified Delay condoned.
$\begin{array}{c}\n\begin{bmatrix}\n\text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SINR} \ \text{SIN$ of the Annexures is allowed.
It is pointed out by learned Solicitor General that there are 4. conflicting judgments on the issue of limitation.
5. Issue notice, returnable on 20112023.
6. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
7. In the meanwhile, the operation of the impugned Judgment dated 03042023 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh in Arbitration Misc. Case No.106 of 2022 shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing.
(VISHAL ANAND) (BEENA JOLLY) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH)
