Preet Enterprises vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh, Hon'ble Aravind Kumar
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
11 May 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION [C] NO.29967/2018
M/S LOVELY PET Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
K. RADHALAKSHMI & ANR. Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 30197/2018 (XII) |
---|
SLP(C) No. 32921/2018 (XII) |
SLP(C) No. 32923/2018 (XII) |
SLP(C) No. 30440/2018 (XII) |
SLP(C) No. 30423/2018 (XII) |
SLP(C) No. 30425/2018 (XII) |
SLP(C) No. 30362/2018 (XII) |
SLP(C) No. 2872/2021 (XII) |
SLP(C) No. 4299-4300/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 41/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 44/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 37/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 45/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 50/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 39/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 49/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 43/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 46/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 42/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 40/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 51/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 56/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 38/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 48/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 47/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 63/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 57/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 66/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 61/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 64/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 54/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 65/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 53/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 55/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 60/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 62/2022 (XII) |
T.C.(C) No. 52/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 59/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 74/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 76/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 77/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 78/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 73/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 81/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 80/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 72/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 75/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 71/2022 (XII)<br>T.C.(C) No. 79/2022 (XII) |
---|
O R D E R
Applications for impleadment/intervention are allowed.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment.
However, we grant liberty to the petitioners to work out all remedies in the manner known to law, if the law so permits, qua the Government.
It is sufficient for us to observe that the property has now come to the holding of Government and it is well open to them to deal with it in the manner that they deem fit.If there is already an allotment which has been made, it can be proceeded with in accordance with law.
The Special Leave Petitions and the Transferred cases have been filed by the tenant(s) inter alia alleging that the respondents being the landlord had lost title even at the time of granting tenancy. The Writ Petition(s)/Writ Appeals had been filed by the allottee pursuant to an attempt made by the original landlord in challenging the Urban Land Ceiling proceedings which have now become final. The Writ Petitioner(s) is/are the allottees of land from the Government.
Mr. V. Ramesh, learned counsel for the allottee in the Writ Petition(s)/Writ Appeals submits that he has to be given the benefit of allottment.
Mr. Jaideep Gupta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Government submits that it is for the Government to take appropriate action in the manner known to law.
We are of the view that inasmuch as the property has become one which is of the Government, it is for the Government to take appropriate action in the manner known to law.
We grant liberty to the petitioners to take all pleas in the execution petition, including the contention that the decree cannot be executed.
Additionally, we hold that it is open to the Writ Petitioners/Writ Appellants and the petitioners in the Special Leave Petitions to work out remedies in the manner known to law.
Similarly, liberty is also granted to the respondents-landlord(s) to take appropriate steps in tune with the report filed by the Government.
The Special Leave Petitions and the Transferred Cases stand disposed of accordingly.
...................J. [M.M. SUNDRESH]
...................J. [ARAVIND KUMAR]
NEW DELHI; NOVEMBER 05, 2024.
ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.12 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29967/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-07-2018 in SA No. 701/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras)
M/S LOVELY PET Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
K. RADHALAKSHMI & ANR. Respondent(s) IA No. 160354/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 160349/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 94067/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES WITH SLP(C) No. 30197/2018 (XII) FOR impleading party ON IA 160377/2019 IA No. 160382/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 160377/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT SLP(C) No. 32921/2018 (XII) FOR impleading party ON IA 160383/2019 IA No. 160386/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS SLP(C) No. 32923/2018 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.166109/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING) SLP(C) No. 30440/2018 (XII) FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 160378/2019 FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 160379/2019 SLP(C) No. 30423/2018 (XII) FOR impleading party ON IA 160367/2019 FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 160370/2019 SLP(C) No. 30425/2018 (XII) FOR impleading party ON IA 160362/2019 IA No. 160364/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS SLP(C) No. 30362/2018 (XII) FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 160328/2019 FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 160330/2019 SLP(C) No. 2872/2021 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)
SLP(C) No. 4299-4300/2022 (XII) IA No. 35140/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT T.C.(C) No. 41/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 44/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 37/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 45/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 50/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 39/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 49/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 43/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 46/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 42/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 40/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 51/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 56/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 38/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 48/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 47/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION)
T.C.(C) No. 63/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 57/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 66/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 61/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 64/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 54/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 65/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 53/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 55/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 60/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 62/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 52/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 59/2022 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 74/2022 (XII) T.C.(C) No. 76/2022 (XII) T.C.(C) No. 77/2022 (XII) T.C.(C) No. 78/2022 (XII) T.C.(C) No. 73/2022 (XII) T.C.(C) No. 81/2022 (XII) T.C.(C) No. 80/2022 (XII) T.C.(C) No. 72/2022 (XII) T.C.(C) No. 75/2022 (XII) IA No. 117580/2023 - STAY APPLICATION T.C.(C) No. 71/2022 (XII) T.C.(C) No. 79/2022 (XII) Date : 05-11-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR By Courts Motion For Petitioner(s) Mr. V Ramesh, Adv. Mr. G Nagarajan, Adv. Mr. Krishna Bhagwath, Adv. Mr. Mayilsamy K, Adv. Mr. P.s Devarajan, Adv. Mr. Jay Kishor Singh, AOR Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR Mr. Nishant Anshul, Adv. Mr. Ankit Vashishta, Adv. Mr. Shrenik Jain, Adv. Mr. Amar Shankar, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Mohsin, Adv. Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. Kumanan, AOR Mrs. Deepa. S, Adv. Mr. Sheikh F. Kalia, Adv. Mr. Veshal Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Chinmay Anand Panigrahi, Adv. Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR Mr. P. Subba Reddy, Adv. Mr. G. Ananda Selvam, Adv. Mr. Habib Muzaffar, Adv. Ms. Lakshmi Ramamurthy, AOR Mr. Jay Kishor Singh, AOR Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. Kumanan, AOR Mrs. Deepa S, Adv.
8
Mr. Sheikh F. Kalia, Adv. Mr. Veshal Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Chinmay Anand Panigrahi, Adv.
Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Applications for impleadment/intervention are allowed.
The Special Leave Petitions and the Transferred Cases stand disposed of accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) [SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]