Preet Enterprises vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.10+17
COURT NO.3
SECTION XII
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29967/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-07-2018 in SA No. 701/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras)
$M/S$ LOVELY PET
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
K. RADHALAKSHMI & ANR.
Respondent $(s)$
IA No. 160354/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 160349/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 94067/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
WITH SLP(C) No. 30197/2018 (XII) IA No. 160382/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS <pre>IA No. 160377/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)</pre>
SLP(C) No. 32921/2018 (XII) IA No. 160386/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS <pre>IA No. 160383/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)</pre>
SLP(C) No. 32923/2018 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.166109/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY <pre>IN REFILING)</pre>
SLP(C) No. 30440/2018 (XII) IA No. 160379/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS <pre>IA No. 160378/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)</pre>
SLP(C) No. 30423/2018 (XII) IA No. 160370/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS <pre>IA No. 160367/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)</pre>
SLP(C) No. 30425/2018 (XII) IA No. 160364/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS <pre>IA No. 160362/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)</pre> Signature Not Verified $(0.30362/2018)$ No. 30362/2018 17.49.41 No. 160330/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS <pre>IA No. 160328/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)</pre>
SLP(C) No. 2872/2021 (XII) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)
SLP(C) No. 4299-4300/2022 (XII) IA No. 35140/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) T.C.(C) No. 41/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 44/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 37/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 45/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 50/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 39/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 49/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 43/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 46/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 42/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 40/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 51/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 56/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 38/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 48/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 47/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION)
T.C.(C) No. 63/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 57/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 66/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 61/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 64/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 54/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 65/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 53/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 55/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 60/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 62/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 52/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No. 59/2022 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) T.C.(C) No 71/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 74/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 76/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 77/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 78/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 73/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 81/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 80/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 72/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 75/2022 (XVI-A) T.C.(C) No. 79/2022 (XVI-A) Date : 12-07-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA For Parties Ms. Nalini Chidambaram, Sr. Adv. Ms. Akanksha Vigyan, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR Mr. V. Ramesh, Adv. Mr. Jay Kishor Singh, AOR Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. Kumanan, AOR Mr. Sheikh Fakhruddin Kalia, Adv. Mr. P. Subba Reddy, adv. Mr. Shrinik Jain, Adv. Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR Mr. G. Ananda Selvam, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Mayilsamy K., Adv. Mr. R. Sathish Kumar, Adv. Ms. Lakshmi Ramamurthy, AOR Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated Mr. D. Kumanan, learned counsel for the respondent-State seeking
adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty, hearing of these matters is deferred for two weeks, as a last indulgence.
We make it clear that no request for
4
adjournment at the instance of any party will be entertained on the next date of hearing.
(NEETU KHAJURIA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS
(VIDYA NEGI) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR