Radlay Metal Products Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. Etc vs. State (Nct Of Delhi) And Anr. Etc
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble A.K. Sikri
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:6 Jul 2015
CNR:SCIN010136522015
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
27 Apr 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ITEM NO.5 | COURT NO.2 | SECTION II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E C O U R T O F | I N D I A | ||||
| RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | |||||
| Petition(s) for | Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) | No(s). | 3529-3535/2015 | ||
| (Arising<br>in CRLMC<br>in CRLMC<br>in CRLMC<br>in CRLMC<br>the High | out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/03/2015<br>No. 393/2015,17/03/2015 in CRLMC No. 389/2015,17/03/2015<br>No. 390/2015,17/03/2015 in CRLMC No. 391/2015,17/03/2015<br>No. 392/2015,17/03/2015 in CRLMC No. 394/2015,17/03/2015<br>No. 388/2015,17/03/2015 in CRLMC No. 395/2015 passed by<br>Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) | ||||
| M/S. RADLAY METAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ETC. Petitioner(s) | |||||
| VERSUS | |||||
| STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. ETC. | Respondent(s) | ||||
| (with office report) | |||||
| Date: 06/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. | |||||
| CORAM : | HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA<br>HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI | ||||
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Mohit Chaudhary,Adv.<br>Mr. Vaishali Mittal,Adv.<br>Ms. Puja Sharma,Adv. | ||||
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora,Adv.<br>Ms. Shreya Agrawal,Adv.<br>Ms. Priyadarshnee Singh,Adv. | ||||
| UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | |||||
| Heard. | |||||
| Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>Mahabir Singh<br>Date: 2015.07.08<br>10:12:22 IST<br>Reason: | respondent is formal in nature. | Learned counsel for respondent no.2 prays for and is<br>granted four weeks' time to file a counter affidavit. Notice<br>to respondent no.1-State is dispensed with as the said | |||
| Supreme Court. | Learned counsel for the parties submit that their clients<br>are not averse to exploring the possibility of an amicable<br>settlement with the help of the Mediation Centre in the |
The parties are accordingly referred to the Mediation Centre in the Supreme Court with the direction that they shall appear before the said Centre on Monday, the 3 rd August, 2015 for a possible amicable settlement.
2
The Mediation Centre shall submit a report as to the progress made expeditiously but not later than two months from the date the parties appear before it.
The amount deposited by the petitioner shall be invested in a term deposit initially for a period of six months to enure interest for the benefit of the successful party.
(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search