National Insurance Co. Ltd vs. Nithin

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sanjay Karol
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:17 Apr 2025
CNR:SCIN010136362025

AI Summary

The Supreme Court has condoned the delay in a Special Leave Petition filed by National Insurance Co. Ltd. challenging a High Court order on compensation. While refusing to interfere with the compensation amount at this stage, the Court issued notice to the respondents on a significant question of law, signaling further legal scrutiny. This decision ensures the continuation of the legal battle, focusing on the underlying legal principle rather than the compensation quantum itself.

Ratio Decidendi:
The Supreme Court, while exercising its discretion to condone delay in filing a Special Leave Petition challenging a High Court's compensation award in a motor vehicle accident claim, may decline to interfere with the quantum of compensation determined by the High Court, but can still issue notice on a distinct question of law involved in the petition for further adjudication.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:Diary No. 13636/2025
Case Type:Special Leave Petition (Civil)
Case Sub-Type:SLP - Motor Vehicle Accident Claim
Secondary Case Numbers:SCIN010136362025, 11172/2025
Order Date:2025-04-17
Filing Year:2025
Court:Supreme Court Of India
Bench:Division Bench
Judges:Hon'ble Sanjay Karol, Hon'ble Manoj Misra

Petitioner's Counsel

Amit Kumar Singh
Advocate - Appeared
K. Enatoli Sema
Advocate - Appeared
Chubalemla Chang
Advocate - Appeared
Prana Newmai
Advocate - Appeared

Advocates on Record

Amit Kumar Singh

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

National Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a Special Leave Petition (Diary No. 13636/2025) before the Supreme Court challenging the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru's judgment and order dated 2024-11-05 in MFA No. 8639/2018 (MV-I), which concerned compensation. The petition involved a delay in filing, for which IA No. 88994/2025 was submitted. The Supreme Court, on 2025-04-17, condoned this delay, decided not to interfere with the compensation amount, but issued notice on a specific question of law, scheduling the next hearing for 2025-05-09.

Timeline of Events

2018

MFA No. 8639/2018 (MV-I) filed in the High Court of Karnataka.

2024-11-05

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru passes final judgment and order in MFA No. 8639/2018 (MV-I).

2025-03-13

Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 13636/2025 filed in the Supreme Court.

2025-04-08

IA No. 88994/2025 for Condonation of Delay in Filing filed.

2025-04-17

Supreme Court hears the matter, condones delay, and issues notice on a question of law.

2025-05-09

Next date of listing for the matter in Supreme Court.

Key Factual Findings

The delay in filing the Special Leave Petition is condoned.

Source: Current Court Finding

The Court is not inclined to interfere with the amount of compensation determined by the High Court.

Source: Current Court Finding

A question of law is involved in the present petition that warrants issuing notice.

Source: Current Court Finding

Primary Legal Issues

1.Whether the High Court's determination of compensation in the Motor Vehicle Accident case was legally sound.
2.The specific 'question of law' on which the Supreme Court has issued notice to the respondents.

Secondary Legal Issues

1.Condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition.

Questions of Law

The question of law involved in the present petition.

Statutes Applied

Motor Vehicles Act
Inferred as the underlying statute governing compensation for motor vehicle accidents, as indicated by 'MV-I' in the impugned order details.

Petitioner's Arguments

The petitioner, National Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the High Court's judgment and order dated 2024-11-05, specifically questioning the amount of compensation determined in the motor vehicle accident case. They also sought condonation of delay in filing their Special Leave Petition.

Respondent's Arguments

No specific arguments for the respondent side are detailed in this order, as notice is yet to be served and a counter affidavit is awaited. Implicitly, they would defend the High Court's compensation award.

Court's Reasoning

The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition, indicating it found sufficient grounds to overlook the delay. The Court expressed that it was not inclined to interfere with the compensation amount already determined by the High Court, suggesting a preliminary satisfaction with the quantum. However, it deemed a specific 'question of law' important enough to issue notice, signaling a need for further legal examination on that particular aspect, distinct from the compensation quantum.

Judicial Philosophy Indicators:
  • Emphasis on Substantive Justice (by condoning delay to allow a hearing)
  • Judicial Prudence (by not interfering with compensation quantum at this stage but exploring a question of law)
Order Nature:Procedural
Disposition Status:Pending

Impugned Orders

High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru
Case: MFA No. 8639/2018 (MV-I)
Date: 2024-11-05

Specific Directions

  1. 1.Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition is condoned.
  2. 2.Notice is to be issued on the question of law involved in the present petition.
  3. 3.Dasti service, in addition, is permitted for the notice.
  4. 4.Steps for service of notice must be taken within two weeks.
  5. 5.The notice shall explicitly mention that respondents are required to file a counter affidavit before the next date of listing.
  6. 6.The matter is to be listed on 2025-05-09.

Precedential Assessment

Persuasive (Procedural guidance and preliminary view on quantum)

This is an interim procedural order primarily dealing with condonation of delay and issuance of notice. While the Court's stance on not interfering with the compensation quantum is a significant observation, the full legal issue remains open for detailed arguments after notice. It offers guidance on the Supreme Court's approach to such procedural matters and preliminary review of compensation awards.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Legal professionals should note that the Supreme Court may condone delay in SLPs, even if challenging compensation awards, allowing for substantive legal questions to be addressed.
2.When challenging compensation awards, while the quantum may not be easily interfered with, identifying a distinct 'question of law' is crucial for admission and further proceedings.
3.Prompt action on court directives, such as dasti service of notice and filing counter affidavits within specified timelines, is essential to avoid adverse orders.

Legal Tags

Supreme Court Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation QuantumSpecial Leave Petition Delay Condonation PrinciplesQuestion of Law Issuance of Notice Supreme CourtKarnataka High Court MFA Motor Vehicle AppealsInsurance Company Challenge To Compensation Award

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

First Hearing

Listed On:

17 Apr 2025

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

COURT NO.16

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 13636/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-11-2024 in MFA No. 8639/2018 (MV-I) passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru]

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

<pre>Petitioner(s)</pre>

VERSUS

NITHIN & ANR.

Respondent(s)

(IA No. 88994/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Date: 17-04-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, AOR Ms. K Enatoli Sema, Adv. Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv. Mr. Prana Newmai, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. Petitioner lays challenge to the judgment and order dated 05-11-2024 in MFA No. 8639/2018 (MV-I) titled "Master Nithin (Minor) Vs. Sri K.G. Sudheendra & Anr." passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru.

$\mathbf{2}$ . Delay condoned.

We are not inclined to interfere with the amount of $3.$ compensation determined by the High Court.

Signam/MenNet Verified However, we issue notice on the question of law involved 13:40 The present petition.

$\mathbf{1}$

5. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Let steps for service be taken within two weeks.

6. In the notice itself let it be mentioned that respondents are required to file the counter affidavit before the next date of listing.

7. List on 09.05.2025.

(RAJNI MUKHI) (ANU BHALLA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)