SECTION-IV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2239 OF 2013

National Highways Authority of India ...Appellant

VERSUS

Indore Truck Operators & Transport Society & Ors. ...Respondents

OFFICE REPORT ON PRE-FINAL HEARING

Office Report is prepared as per Circular No.F.41/Judl./2008 dated 17th December, 2008:-

• (a) There are 5 Respondents in this appeal. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are represented by Mr. C.D. Singh, Advocate. They have been served directly with the Notice under Rule-8(II), Order-XIX, S.C.R. 2013. Respondent No. 5 has been served at with the notice at SLP stage but has not chosen to enter appearance, so far.
• (b) Original Record in the Appeal has been returned to the concerned High Court vide Office Order dated 03.12.2014.
• (c) Not applicable.
• (d) Not applicable.
• (e) No Application for Substitution is pending.
• (f) Counsel for the Appellants as well as Counsel for Respondents have not filed Statement of Case. In terms of Rule 32, Sub Rule-2 of S.C.R. 2013, it is presumed that the Appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking Special Leave to Appeal (SLP)/Appeal, as Statement of Case, and does not desire to file any further Statement of Case. If the Respondent has not filed Statement of Case within the stipulated time as provided in Sub Rule-1 of S.C.R. 2013, it is presumed that the Respondent does not desire to lodge Statement of Case in the appeal.
• (g) Not applicable. Dated this the 26th day of May, 2016.

Copy to:-

• 1. M/s. M.V. Kini & Associates Kini House, 6/39, Jangpura 'B', New Delhi-14.
• 2. Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Advocate Ch. No. 113, Suprme Enclave, Mayur Vihar-I, Delhi-110091.
• 3. Mr. C.D. Singh, Advocate A-394, Defence Colony, New Delhi.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

guit e/C- 1