Heirs Of Rajabbhai Mohammed Hussain Shaikh vs. The State Of Gujarat
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble Dipankar Datta
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed as withdrawn
Listed On:
17 Jul 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
93519/2023,93520/2023,93521/2023,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.20
COURT NO.5 $\mathcal{L}$
SECTION III
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ....................................
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08-12-2022 in SCA No.13904/2014 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad)
HEIRS OF RAJABBHAI MOHAMMED HUSSAIN SHAIKH & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
$Respondent(s)$
$(IA)$ No.93521/2023-CONDONATION $OF$ DELAY $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{N}$ FILING $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $TA$ No.93519/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.93520/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No.93521/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No.93519/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No.93520/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 17-07-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Iqbal Syed, Sr.Adv. | |
---|---|---|
Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR | ||
Ms. Deeksha Gaur, Adv. | ||
Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv. | ||
Mr. Prithu Parimal, Adv. |
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners seeks and is 1. permitted to withdraw this Special Leave Petition $\overline{as}$ the petitioners want to move an appropriate application before the High Court along with the certified copy of order dated 15.03.1969, DECK OF A PAGE OF THE ADDITIONAL MAGNETICS AND AGRICULTURAL LANDS Tribunal, City and Daskroi Taluka, Ahmedabad.
$2.$ Permission as prayed for, is granted. 3. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
4. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.)
DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)