State Of Tamil Nadu Public Works Department Through The Secretary vs. The State Of Karnataka Government Of Karnataka . By Its Chief Secretary

ITEM NO.101

COURT NO. $1$

SECTION XIV

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s).2453/2007

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

Appellant(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF TAMIL NADU BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS. Respondent $(s)$

(PART-HEARD BY HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HONBLE AMITAVA ROY AND HONBLE A.M. KHANWILKAR (TO BE TAKEN AS FIRST ITEM BY THREE JUDGES BENCH). PART HEARD MATTER FOR ON IA 51506/2007 FOR $ON \tIA$ 6913/2008 FOR ON IA 28609/2008 FOR ON IA 34508/2008 FOR ON IA 41761/2008 FOR ON IA 77402/2008 FOR ON IA 78964/2008 FOR ON IA 85532/2008 FOR ON IA 94499/2008 FOR ON IA 11933/2009 FOR ON IA 66943/2009 FOR ON IA 61696/2011 FOR ON IA 75313/2011 FOR ON IA 94236/2011 FOR ON IA 2531/2012 FOR ON IA 27799/2012 FOR ON IA 11/2011 FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 14/2012 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 3/2009 FOR [APP FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS] ON IA 4/2008 FOR ON IA 15/2012 FOR ON IA 16/2012 FOR ON IA 9582/2013 FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 17/2013 FOR ON IA 1571/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 18/2013 FOR ON IA 19/2014 FOR ON IA 20/2014 FOR ON IA 21/2015 FOR ON IA 22/2016 FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ADVERTISEMENTS ON RECORD ON IA 23/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 24/2017) WITH C.A. No. $2454/2007$ (XII) (FOR ON IA 39668/2012 FOR ON IA $1/2012$ FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2016 FOR ON IA $3/2016$ FOR ON IA $4/2016$ ) C.A. No. $2456/2007$ (XIV) (FOR ON IA 51505/2007 FOR ON IA 30822/2008 FOR ON IA 87651/2008 FOR ON IA 28784/2009 FOR ON IA 36816/2012 FOR ON IA 7/2012 FOR ON IA 30091/2013 FOR ON IA 2/2007 Signal ON IA 53479/2013 $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}}}$ ON IA $4/2012$ FUR ON IA 63024/2014 FOR ON IA 8/2015 FOR ON IA 7/2013 FOR ON IA 8/2014 FOR ON IA 9/2014

C.A.No.2453/2007 etc. 2

FOR ON IA 10/2016 FOR ON IA 11/2016 FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 12/2016 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 14/2016 FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 15/2016 FOR ON IA 16/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 17/2016 FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 18/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 19/2016 FOR ON IA 20/2016 FOR ON IA 21/2017 FOR ON IA 22/2017 FOR [I/A FOR TAKING ON RECORD THE FACTUAL POSITION OF FLOWS] ON IA 53899/2017) CONMT.PET.(C) No.225/2013 In C.A. No.2456/2007 Date : 13-09-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Appellant(s) Mr.F.S.Nariman, Sr.Adv. (For State of Mr.S.S.Javali, Sr.Adv. Karnataka) Mr.Shyam Divan, Sr.Adv. Mr.M.R.Naik, Advocate General Mr.Mohan V.Katarki, Adv. Mr.S.C.Sharma, Adv. Mr.Brijesh Kalappa, Adv. Mr.R.S.Ravi, Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr.J.M.Gangadhar, Adv. Mr.Ranvir Singh, Adv. Mr.Abdul Azeem Kalebudde, Adv. In C.A.No.2456/07 Mr.Shekhar Naphade, Sr.Adv. (For State of Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Tamil Nadu) Mr.G.Umapathy, Adv. Mr.C.Paramasivan, Adv. Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR For State of Mr.Jaideep Gupta, Sr.Adv. Kerala Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Mr.Jishnu M.L., Adv. Mrs.Priyanka Prakash, Adv. Mrs.Beena Prakash, Adv. Mr.Vijay Shankar V.L., Adv. Mr.Kunal Chattarjee, Adv. Mr.Saurabh Gupta, Adv. Mr.B. Balaji, AOR

For Respondent(s) In C.A.Nos.2453 & Mr.Shekhar Naphade, Sr.Adv. 2454/2007 Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. (For State of Mr.G.Umapathy, Adv. Tamil Nadu) Mr.C.Paramasivan, Adv. Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR For Govt. of Mr.A.S.Nambiar, Sr.Adv. Puducherry Mr.V.G.Pragasam, AOR Mr.Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv. Mr.P.K.Manohar, Adv. Mrs.S.Vasudhun, Adv. For UOI Mr.Wasim Qadri, Adv. Mr.Ajay Sharma, Adv. Ms.Madhvi Divan, Adv. Ms.Nidhi Khanna, Adv. Mr.M.K.Maroria, Adv. Mr.Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR Mr.Pankaj Kr.Mishra, Adv. Mr. A.S.Bhasme, Adv. Mr. D.S.Mahra, AOR (NP) Mr.Rajesh Mahale, AOR Mr. B. Balaji, AOR Mr. R. Nedumaran, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Mr.A.S.Nambiar, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Government of Puducherry completed his arguments. Thereafter, Mr.F.S.Nariman, learned senior counsel representing the State of Karnataka advanced his arguments in reply and concluded the same. Mr.Mohan V.Katarki, learned counsel, has commenced his arguments in reply. According to the assessment, he would take an hour or so on 14.09.2017. Thereafter, Mr.Shyam Divan, learned senior counsel shall argue for thirty minutes and Mr.Jaideep Gupta, learned senior counsel representing the State of Kerala shall argue for another thirty minutes as suggested by him. Mr.Shekhar Naphade, learned senior counsel representing the State of Tamil Nadu submits that after Mr.Mohan V.Katarki, learned counsel and Mr.Shyam Divan and Mr.Jaideep Gupta, learned senior counsel conclude their arguments on 14.09.2017, he shall commence his arguments and, as undertaken, shall not take more than an hour or so.

Let the matter be listed for further hearing on 14.09.2017.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (SHAKTI PARKASH SHARMA) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR