G. Sabitha vs. High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad Rep. By Its Registrar General
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
Other [LIST BEFORE HON. CT.]
Listed On:
12 Nov 2017
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT $NO.5$
TTEM NO. $22$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 146/2018
MANGLESH CHOUBEY & ORS.
VERSUS
THE HON. HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No. 26585/2018-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS)
Date: 23-03-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhilash M. R., Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. A. D. N. Rao, Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Ms. Tulika Chikker, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Issue notice.
Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
Mr. A. D. N. Rao, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-High Court of Delhi.
Since the petitioners had filed this writ petition on 13.02.2018, we are of the view that the petitioners should also be <sup>ion</sup> visually permitted to participate in the selection process, 12.59.00<mark>1||5|</mark><br>Reaso<mark>s u</mark>bject to final orders passed by this Court. Ordered accordingly.
SECTION X
Petitioner(s)
We make it clear that mere participation in the selection process will not confer the petitioners right to claim any equity.
Tag with Writ Petition (C) No. 64 of 2018 and other connected matters.
(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU DIWAN)
COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
PS : The report of the Committee of High Court of Delhi, handed over in court by Sh. A. D. N. Rao, learned counsel, is returned back to him in Court.