G. Sabitha vs. High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad Rep. By Its Registrar General
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
Other [LIST BEFORE HON. CT.]
Listed On:
12 Nov 2017
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
URGENT/OUT TODAY
SECTION X
ITEM NOS.16, 17, 18, 19 COURT NO.5
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 138/2018
ANU AGGARWAL & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ORS.
$Respondent(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION AND IA No.25833/2018-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION)
WITH $W.P.(C)$ NO.139/2018 $W.P.(C)$ NO.140/2018 $W.P.(C)$ NO.145/2018 (WITH APPLN(S) FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION)
Date : 20-02-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
$CORAM$ : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D.K. Devesh, AOR Mr. S.K. Roshanb, Adv. Mr. U.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Goel, AOR Ms. Naveen Goel, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Adv. Mr. Harsh Jaidka, Adv. Mr. Ajay Choudhary, AOR Mr. Vinay Rajput, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
The petitioners in these petitions have two contentions - (i) they have completed seven years combined service as an Advocate and Hadicial Officer. (ii) As on the date of the advertisement inviting applications for the post of District Judge and as on the last date
$\mathbf{1}$
of submission of the applications, the petitioners have crossed the age of 35 years but some of them may not have attained the age of 35 years as on 01.01.2017.
We have already issued notice in similar cases and permitted the persons concerned to provisionally participate in the selection process.
Issue notice.
There will be a direction to the Registrar, High Court of Delhi to provisionally register the applications of the petitioners herein for the selection process to the post of District Judge, in case they have a total service of seven years either as Judicial Officer or Judicial Officer and Advocate combined and in case they have crossed the age of 35 years as on the date of publication of the notification inviting applications. Needless also to say that this is subject to the petitioners fulfilling other conditions.
Tag with W.P.(C) No.64/2018.
(NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR