Vasudevan Bhattathiri vs. The State Of Kerala

X ITEM NO.49 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTI ON XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27686-27688/2014 MAHESHWAR SINGH AND ANR Petition er(s) VERSUS STATE OF HP AND ORS Responde nt(s) Date : 04/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Puneet Taneja,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv. Mr. Anshul Sehgal, Adv. Mr. Tenzing Tsering, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Among eight respondents herein, service upon respondent Nos.1, 2 and 7 is complete, however, it is awaited for respondent No.3. The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Karanvir has appeared for respondent Nos.1 to 3 but none has entered appearance for respondent No.7. Vakalatnama for three of the respondents and counter Signature Not Verified affidavit also be filed within the respect ive Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.09.09 stipulated time period. 17:13:09 IST Reason:

affidavit. It is mentioned that counter affidavit on behalf Item No.49 -2 of these respondents has been filed. Registry to verify the same and to take the same on record. Opportunity of respondent No.6 to file the counter affidavit has already been declined. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.8 has come on record. List again on 5.10.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar X ITEM NO.49 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTI ON XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27686-27688/2014 MAHESHWAR SINGH AND ANR Petition er(s) VERSUS STATE OF HP AND ORS Responde nt(s) Date : 04/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Puneet Taneja,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv. Mr. Anshul Sehgal, Adv. Mr. Tenzing Tsering, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Among eight respondents herein, service upon respondent Nos.1, 2 and 7 is complete, however, it is awaited for

respondent No.3. The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Karanvir has appeared for respondent Nos.1 to 3 but none has entered appearance for respondent No.7. Vakalatnama for three of the respondents and counter Signature Not Verified affidavit also be filed within the respect ive Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.09.09 stipulated time period. 17:13:09 IST Reason:

Respondent Nos.4 and 5 have also not filed the counter affidavit. It is mentioned that counter affidavit on behalf Item No.49 -2-

of these respondents has been filed. Registry to verify the same and to take the same on record.

Opportunity of respondent No.6 to file the counter

affidavit has already been declined.

Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.8 has come

on record.

List again on 5.10.2015.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar