Jagruti Rajesh Shah (Dead) Through Lrs vs. Mahek Developers
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 ITEM NO.49 SECTION IX
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 8515/2022 JAGRUTI RAJESH SHAH & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
Respondent(s)
M/S MAHEK DEVELOPERS & ORS.
Date: 11-07-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Kunal Cheema, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Ms. Deeplaxmi Subhash Matwankar, AOR Mr. Ajay Pachauri, Adv. Mr. Aviral Kashyap, AOR Mr. Arpit Rai, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the <pre>Court made the following</pre>
O R D E R
Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and $3$ .
Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent no. 4.
Two weeks time, is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner, to file affidavit along with proof of service of notice, already issued to respondent no. 2
Signature Not Verified Vakalatnama and Counter affidavit has already been filed on 1539D half of respondent nos. 6, 10, 11, 17, 19, 20, 23 to 26.
S. Matwankar, Advocate has filed counter Deeplaxmi $M_S$ affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 5, 7 to 9, 12 to 16, 18, 21,
22, 27 to 31, but not filed vakalatnam.
Ld. Counsel for respondent submits that vakalatnama is there on the record and he will pursue with the registry in taking on record the said vakalatnama with respect to the corresponding respondents, as the respondent numbers may have altered. One week time is granted to the counsel to clarify the same
List again on 10.08.2022.
S.P.S. LALER Registrar