Balraj Singh vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1132/2018 RATTAN KAUR & ORS. Petitioner(s)
REGISTRAR COURT. 2
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Date: 01-08-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Sarla Chandra, AOR
Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that he will file the counter affidavit today itself.
Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1,3,4,9,14 and 19 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 1.5.2018 $\texttt{of} \quad$ this Court $\mathbf{in}$ respect of respondent Nos. $12$ , $18$ , $22$ , $29$ , $32$ , $35$ , $36$ , $38$ - $42$ , $30$ and $31$ .
The office report indicates that the vakalatnama filed by Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.5 to 8,10,11,13,15-17,20,21,23-28,33,34 and 37 is defective. Learned Signator Receivement and shall within a period of four weeks, as last chance cure Digitally side of the said vakalatnama.
List again on 18.9.2018.
SECTION IV-B
Respondent $(s)$