Rajasthan Public Service Commission Secretary vs. Rakesh Pahadia

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Kurian Joseph
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:19 Jul 2017
CNR:SCIN010135012017

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

19 Jul 2017

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9289 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 28364 OF 2015]

RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Appellant (s)

VERSUS

KAILASH CHANDRA JYOTISHI AND ORS. Respondent(s)

with

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9328 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 18493 OF 2017] [DIARY NO. 13338 OF 2017]

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9322 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 18485 OF 2017] [DIARY NO. 13339 OF 2017]

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9323 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 18486 OF 2017] [DIARY NO.13501 OF 2017

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9324 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 18487 OF 2017] [DIARY NO. 13502 OF 2017]

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9325 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 18489 OF 2017] [DIARY NO. 13684 OF 2017]

CIVIL APPEAL NO.9326 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 18490 OF 2017] [DIARY NO. 13686 OF 2017]

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9327 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 18491 OF 2017] [DIARY NO. 13687 OF 2017]

J U D G M E N T

KURIAN, J. Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date: 2017.07.25 13:12:39 IST Reason:

Signature Not Verified

1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.

2. It is not in dispute that in view of the subsequent developments, the degree obtained by the writ petitioners (pvt. respondents herein) was duly recognised and they had become duly qualified. If that be so, there is a duty cast on the Public Service Commission to consider them for recruitment, as rightly directed by the High Court.

3. It is not the concern of the Public Service Commission as to how the State will accommodate them in respect of the vacancies available or to be created. The duty of the Public Service Commission is only to conduct the recruitment in terms of the request made by the appointing authority. Once the candidates are duly qualified, the Commission is duty bound under law to consider them also for the recruitment and make the appropriate recommendation. The High Court has done only that.

4. It is also to be noted that the State Government has not chosen to file any Special Leave Petition. It is also submitted by the learned counsel that these appeals have been filed as directed by the State Government. We find it difficult to appreciate the stand taken by the State Government.

2

5. The Public Service Commission is only an agency to make the recruitment. Rest is for the State, therefore, the State cannot bank on the Public Service Commission as far as the appointments are concerned.

6. For all the reasons stated above, we do not find any merit in these appeals which are, accordingly, dismissed.

Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.

.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]

.......................J. [ R. BANUMATHI ]

New Delhi; July 19, 2017. S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28364/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-08-2015 in DBCSA No. 428/2015 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jaipur) RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Petitioner(s) VERSUS KAILASH CHANDRA JYOTISHI AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH [DIARY NO. 13338 OF 2017] [DIARY NO. 13339 OF 2017] [DIARY NO.13501 OF 2017] (CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SLP) [DIARY NO. 13502 OF 2017] (CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SLP and EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) [DIARY NO. 13684 OF 2017] [DIARY NO. 13686 OF 2017] [DIARY NO. 13687 OF 2017] Date : 19-07-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Surya Kant, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted.

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.6 SECTION XV

The appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment

Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

(Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(8) - 19 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(9) - 19 Jul 2017

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 30 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 30 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 30 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 9 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view