IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

1

CIVIL APPEAL No. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C)………….D. No. 13470 of 2023)

Versus

OM PARKASH (DEAD) THR. LRS. … APPELLANTS

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. … RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. After hearing counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the claim of the appellant(s) for enhancement of compensation is squarely covered by a judgment passed by this Court on 11.03.2019 in C.A. No. 2736/2019 @ SLP (C) No.15098/2016 [Balwant Singh (D) thru. Lrs. Gurbinder Singh vs. The State of Haryana and Ors.].

4. The appellants are, accordingly, held entitled to the same compensation as was awarded in the above-cited decision of this Court.

5. However, we must note that there is an inordinate delay of 4,447 days in filing this appeal. It is thus clarified that the appellants shall not be entitled to any interest for the delay period.

6. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

...................…......J. (SURYA KANT)

..............……....…….....J. (NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL No. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C)………….D. No. 30328 of 2023)

AMAR KAUR (DEAD) TH. LRS. … APPELLANTS

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. … RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. After hearing counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the claim of the appellant(s) for enhancement of compensation is squarely covered by a judgment passed by this Court on 11.03.2019 in C.A. No. 2736/2019 @ SLP (C) No.15098/2016 [Balwant Singh (D) thru. Lrs. Gurbinder Singh vs. The State of Haryana and Ors.].

4. The appellants are also held entitled to same compensation as was awarded in the above-cited decision of this Court.

5. However, we must note that there is an inordinate delay of 2693 days in filing the present appeal. It is thus clarified that the appellants shall not be entitled to any interest for the delayed period.

6. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

...................…......J. (SURYA KANT)

..............……....…….....J. (NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL No. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C)………….D. No. 13469 of 2023)

DAL CHAND (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. … APPELLANTS

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. … RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. After hearing counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the claim of the appellant(s) for enhancement of compensation is squarely covered by a judgment passed by this Court on 11.03.2019 in C.A. No. 2736/2019 @ SLP (C) No.15098/2016 [Balwant Singh (D) thru. Lrs. Gurbinder Singh vs. The State of Haryana and Ors.].

4. The appellants are also held entitled to same compensation as was awarded in the above-cited decision of this Court.

5. However, we must note that there is an inordinate delay of 2567 days in filing the present appeal. It is thus clarified that the appellants shall not be entitled to any interest for the delayed period.

6. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

...................…......J. (SURYA KANT)

..............……....…….....J. (NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL No. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C)………….D. No. 59219 of 2024)

CHANDAN SAINI & ANR. … APPELLANTS

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA … RESPONDENT

O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. After hearing counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the claim of the appellant(s) for enhancement of compensation is squarely covered by a judgment passed by this Court on 11.03.2019 in C.A. No. 2736/2019 @ SLP (C) No.15098/2016 [Balwant Singh (D) thru. Lrs. Gurbinder Singh vs. The State of Haryana and Ors.].

4. The appellants are also held entitled to same compensation as was awarded in the above-cited decision of this Court.

5. However, we must note that there is an inordinate delay of 3205 days in filing the present appeal. It is thus clarified that the appellants shall not be entitled to any interest for the delay period.

6. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

As a result, the pending interlocutory application also stands 7. disposed of.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (SURYA KANT)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH)

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ………………..Diary No(s).13470/2023 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-10-2010 in RFA No.4280/2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh] OM PARKASH (DEAD) THR. LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 80249/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) WITH Diary No(s). 30328/2023 (IV-B) FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 179547/2023 IA No. 179547/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING Diary No(s). 13469/2023 (IV-B) IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 93625/2023 IA No. 93625/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING Diary No(s). 59219/2024 (IV-B) IA No. 35020/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 35059/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING/CURING THE DEFECTS IA No. 35024/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. Date : 07-03-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Somvir Singh Deswal, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Deswal, Adv. Mr. Bhupendra Dalal, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Bhakar, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Drishti Saraf, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C)……….D.No.13470/2023

Delay condoned.

6

ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.3 SECTION IV-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

Leave granted.

The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the signed order.

SLP(C)……….D.No.30328/2023

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the signed

order.

SLP(C)……….D.No.13469/2023

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the signed order.

SLP(C)……….D.No.59219/2024

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the signed order.

As a result, the pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed orders in D.No.13470/2023, D.No.30328/2023, D.No.13469/2023 and D.No.59219/2024 are placed on the file)