Abdul Hamid vs. Union Of India By Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
TTEM NO. $53$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . $\hbox{\tt for}$ 19282-19283/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-02-2016 in WP No. 1299/2016 19-02-2016 in CMA No. 5745/2016 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)
ABDUL HAMID
Petitioner(s)
SECTION XIV
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Respondent(s)
Date: 11-01-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, AOR Mrs. Deepti R. Mehrotra, Adv. Mr. Vibhu Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Ankit Agarwal, Adv.
- For Respondent(s) Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya, Adv. Mr. Karan Nagrath, Adv. Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, Adv. Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv. Ms. Lhingneivah, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
Apparently, the petitioner has been rejected for the post of Constable (Driver) in the CISF on the ground that there was amputation (partial) of his left middle finger, which is likely to Signature Not Verified The staff. Medical evidence working as a member of the staff. Medical evidence $\frac{1}{3}$ certificates were obtained, and a Review Medical Board went into the petitioner's problem, and ultimately opined that it would
interfere with the performance of his duties. A Writ Petition filed against the said decision was dismissed by the impugned judgment.
We are of the tentative view that amputation (partial) on the left middle finger does not directly interfere with the performance of his duties as Constable (Driver). This is something that is best left to the independent Medical Board, which will be constituted by the Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt.
The petitioner will appear before this Authority after eight weeks. The aforesaid Authority, after examining the petitioner, will submit its Report to this Court within a period of four weeks. List thereafter.
(R. NATARAJAN) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER